Representative Case StudyModeled Industry Scenario

Connected Operations Analytics on AWS

ManufacturingUS & CanadaData Engineering

Multi-plant North American manufacturers operating across three to ten production sites generate substantial operational telemetry from SCADA systems, PLCs, MES platforms, and quality inspection equipment — but this data remains siloed in per-site historians and local databases. Plant managers make decisions with two-to-five-day-old data from emailed Excel summaries, while corporate operations leadership has no real-time view of production throughput, quality metrics, or equipment utilisation across the estate.

Representative Case StudyModeled Industry Scenario

Region

US & Canada

Industry

Manufacturing

Client

Available on request

The Problem

The operating challenge

Multi-plant North American manufacturers operating across three to ten production sites generate substantial operational telemetry from SCADA systems, PLCs, MES platforms, and quality inspection equipment — but this data remains siloed in per-site historians and local databases. Plant managers make decisions with two-to-five-day-old data from emailed Excel summaries, while corporate operations leadership has no real-time view of production throughput, quality metrics, or equipment utilisation across the estate.

Operating context

This scenario is set in a mid-market discrete manufacturer with four to eight production sites across the US and Canada, operating in automotive components, industrial equipment, or consumer goods. Each plant runs its own SCADA and MES environment, often from different vendors. The corporate engineering and operations team has attempted to establish cross-site reporting using manual data exports and BI tools but cannot achieve the data freshness or granularity needed for meaningful operational decisions. The IT team is managing a mix of on-premises and AWS infrastructure but has not established a unified data platform. Quality, throughput, and OEE data exists in each plant — the gap is a connected layer that makes it available in one place in near-real-time.

Problem signals in this scenario

Plant-level data locked in proprietary historians with no standard export interface

OEE calculated differently at each site, making cross-plant comparison meaningless

Shift reports assembled manually from 3+ local systems by shift supervisors

Quality incidents identified and contained within individual plants rather than escalated to central QA

Corporate dashboards showing last-week data because ETL jobs run overnight

No single authoritative definition of "production throughput" across the estate

Approach

How CodeCones would approach it

Hover any stage to reveal additional technical detail.

1

Data Source Assessment and Connectivity Design

Each plant's data sources — SCADA, MES, historians, quality systems — are catalogued and assessed for connectivity options, producing a site-by-site integration plan with connection methods and estimated data volumes.

Technical detail

AWS IoT Greengrass or Ignition edge gateways aggregate plant-floor data and forward to AWS IoT Core. MQTT and OPC-UA protocols handle the majority of SCADA and PLC connections. MES systems connected via database replication or REST API where available.

2

AWS IoT Core and Kinesis Ingestion Layer

Plant-floor telemetry streams into AWS IoT Core, with Kinesis Data Streams providing the ordered, durable event log that downstream processing and storage layers consume.

Technical detail

Kinesis Data Streams partitioned by plant-site and equipment type. IoT Core topic hierarchy standardised across all sites to enable cross-site aggregation. Dead letter queue handling for connectivity interruptions ensures no data loss during network events.

3

Real-Time Processing and OEE Calculation

Lambda functions and Kinesis Data Analytics compute OEE components — Availability, Performance, Quality — in near-real-time against a standardised metric definition applied consistently across all sites.

Technical detail

AWS Lambda processes raw telemetry events and computes derived metrics against the corporate OEE definition. Kinesis Data Analytics handles windowed aggregations for shift, daily, and weekly rollups. Metric definitions stored in a central configuration service version-controlled alongside the pipeline code.

4

Redshift Data Warehouse and Historical Analytics

Processed operational data lands in Amazon Redshift, providing the historical depth for trend analysis, plant benchmarking, and capital planning — alongside the near-real-time operational layer.

Technical detail

Kinesis Firehose delivers processed events to S3. AWS Glue crawlers update the Redshift Spectrum external tables. COPY commands load structured operational records into Redshift. Data retention tiered between hot Redshift and cold S3/Glacier.

5

Operational Dashboards and Alerting

QuickSight dashboards provide corporate operations and plant leadership with a real-time view of OEE, quality yield, throughput, and equipment utilisation — with drill-down from estate level to individual equipment.

Technical detail

QuickSight SPICE datasets refreshed at 15-minute intervals for operational dashboards. CloudWatch alarms trigger SNS notifications when site-level metrics fall below defined thresholds. PagerDuty or similar used for on-call escalation of critical production anomalies.

6

Data Quality Governance and MDM

A master data management layer establishes canonical definitions for equipment IDs, shift patterns, product codes, and metric standards — ensuring cross-site data is comparable and analytics outputs are trusted.

Technical detail

AWS Glue Data Quality enforces schema validation and completeness checks on ingested records. Master data (equipment registry, product hierarchy, shift patterns) maintained in RDS and pushed to all downstream consumers. Data lineage tracked through the pipeline for audit and troubleshooting.

Architecture

Representative architecture and toolset

Representative technology options. Specific tools are selected based on your architecture, existing platforms, and engineering requirements. Hover any category to see examples.

Representative technology options. Specific tools are selected based on your architecture, existing platforms, and engineering requirements.

IoT and edge data collection

  • AWS IoT Core
  • Azure IoT Hub
  • MQTT brokers

Streaming data platforms

  • Apache Kafka
  • AWS Kinesis
  • Google Pub/Sub

Cloud data platforms

  • Snowflake
  • Databricks
  • Google BigQuery
  • AWS Redshift

ETL and pipeline orchestration

  • dbt
  • Apache Airflow
  • Fivetran

Data quality and observability

  • Great Expectations
  • Monte Carlo
  • Soda

Delivery

People. Technology. Outcomes.

People

Engineering disciplines involved in this scenario

Data Engineering
Cloud Engineering
Platform Engineering

Technology

Architecture and toolset categories for this scenario

IoT and edge data collection
Streaming data platforms
Cloud data platforms
ETL and pipeline orchestration
Data quality and observability

Outcomes

KPIs this solution can influence

Data freshness — time from plant-floor event to corporate dashboard
Cross-site OEE visibility and comparability
Quality incident escalation time
Analyst time spent on manual report assembly
Capital planning data availability
Unplanned downtime detection and response time

Outcomes

Illustrative outcome profile

These figures are illustrative targets drawn from comparable industry benchmarks. They are not results achieved for a specific client. Actual outcomes depend on your organisation's baseline, technology environment, and implementation approach.

<15 min

Target data freshness from plant-floor event to corporate dashboard in this architecture

4–8 sites

Typical multi-plant estate scope in this scenario

~80%

Reduction in manual shift report preparation time in comparable deployments

Delivery approach

Build. Scale. Ship.

Build

Start with two pilot sites on the same product line. Establish the IoT ingestion path, OEE calculation logic, and a single QuickSight dashboard showing both sites side-by-side. Validate metric definitions with plant engineering teams before expanding.

Scale

Roll out remaining sites progressively, adapting the site-specific integration for each SCADA and MES variant. Add metric coverage — quality, maintenance, energy — as data sources are connected. Expand to Redshift historical analytics once near-real-time layer is stable.

Ship

Full estate deployment with corporate and plant-level dashboards, automated alerting, and shift report elimination. Quarterly data quality review. Data platform team embedded in the corporate engineering function for ongoing operation and expansion.

Recommended engagement model

Embedded Engineering Specialists

Experienced engineers join your existing team and toolchain, extending capacity without a standalone team structure.

Managed Product Engineering

CodeCones takes ownership of a defined delivery outcome with an experienced pod working in your toolchain.

Services

Related service pathways

Hover any card to see the role of each service in this scenario.

Governance

Built-in controls for this scenario

Site-Level Data Isolation

Plant-level data is scoped by site in IAM policies. Corporate team members can view aggregated cross-site analytics; only authorised plant personnel can access plant-specific raw data.

Metric Definition Version Control

OEE and operational metric definitions are version-controlled alongside pipeline code. Changes to metric definitions are deployed through a change control process, with historical data recalculated when definitions change.

Data Quality Alerting

Automated checks on data completeness, schema validity, and expected value ranges alert the data engineering team before quality issues propagate to operational dashboards.

Connectivity Resilience

Edge gateways buffer data locally during network interruptions and replay to the cloud pipeline on reconnection. No data is silently dropped — connectivity events are logged and tracked.

Applicability

Where else this applies

The approach in this scenario transfers to related sectors and use cases.

Oil & gas and energy production monitoring
Pharmaceutical and GMP manufacturing compliance
Food & beverage quality and yield analytics
Utilities and water treatment operations
Logistics and warehouse operations analytics

Discuss This Scenario

Talk to us about a similar challenge

We can walk you through how this approach would map to your organization’s specific context and requirements.

Get in Touch

  • Dedicated project manager from day one
  • Fixed-scope or continuous engagement options
  • Full IP ownership: all deliverables are yours
  • Response within one business day

No commitment required. We typically respond within one business day.

Explore the full Solutions library

Browse all solution blueprints and case studies, filtered by business problem, industry, service, or evidence type.